Wednesday, October 21, 2009
no show
Sunday, October 18, 2009
individual project
For the final project, we are to write 3 blog posts, each with tags, to answer the questions of what we learned in Buddhism, through discussions, and about technology.
I feel the way the questions were asked thought out this class, could be improved. Based on many postings I have read, people tend to write in a very general way. I often find myself wanting to ask - for example?
I wish the questions asked us to give specific examples. Otherwise I feel many people will again give very general, broad-stroke kind of answers.
But at least there is one question about technology that I can certainly use
Saturday, October 17, 2009
Online Learning: More Than Technical Savvy
http://cgi.stanford.edu/~dept-ctl/cgi-bin/tomprof/posting.php?ID=974
True. Willingness can overcome shortage of skills. Skills can be learned but motivation is harder to cultivate, especially in an informal setting
Friday, October 16, 2009
tipping point
Formal in the way people write – very formal. Very few add anything personal, very few asked questions and people do not help answer any questions (e.g. http://www.uwestonline.com/laydharma//mod/forum/discuss.php?d=62)
added 11/7 - writing formal actually creates the distance between the writer and the reader
Thursday, October 15, 2009
wish it was more social
Evidently it was turned into invisible to help forum clean. I don’t know. I feel so far that was the most fun activity. People shared stories and some were quite interesting. You get to know people that way. The other discussions have been quite restricted in the sense that the questions were asked in a narrowed way (in my opinion) without too much flexibility in directions. It is sad to see this best-worst forum go since it represented the best social interactions so far.
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
online as a place or as a support
- Lack of human resources – need skilled helper
- Other priority (e.g. assessment documentation) overtake time
- Multiple responsibilities
- Pressure to live up to the huge responsibility – Grace: we are responsible for our own learning
- Phone calls to participants – reasons given:
busy, no time, busy with other family obligations – Grace: commitment issues
confusing at the beginning with too many emailsdid not watch videos so confused no concept of online learning does not spend a lot of time online, e.g. not online after work, e.g. needs
to know how long it will take to finish each module, e.g. can finish during
lunch breakdoes not think of the Internet as a place of study – not culturally informed
this way, not engaged this way, no concept of community outside the “required”bus driver doesn’t want to drive when he is on vacation - life style not
include the Internet – after work, done with the Internetconsider the Internet as a support of study (this is where I get the
materials) rather than a place of study (this is the place to study)technology is more than just type the paper on the computer but also want to
break away from the computer, does not want to be always onwhat is their relationship with computer?
- Maybe pull back group project
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Holding back my participation
Reason 2: I was quite vocal the week before on discussion. I want to see more clearly how others interact. Once I start posting, I get involved in the discussion itself, not the research. It is hard to be both – a participate and a researcher
Monday, October 12, 2009
much better with the PPT
Today I read the reading and listened to lecture 2. With the PPT in front of me, I felt I was more in tune with the lecture and actually enjoyed it this time. Something as small as just putting up the PPT can make a big difference in learning. Talking about universal design!!!
Because I had the PPT in front of me, and maybe the contents are something more familiar, so maybe I was more at ease while going through the lecture. I actually clicked on all the links leading to additional materials. However, I did not actually read any of them. I wonder if anyone in the class did. Maybe this could be a good post-class survey question.
Some observation about the reading material – very dry, academic writing style, suspect not very accessible to general readers
Some observation about the PPT – very busy background, interesting selection of the Buddha statute that resembles a westerner – good choice!
Sunday, October 11, 2009
PLE
While reading this book, I also remember that I used to like the CoP framework. Maybe I can use that framework again for this research
Another observation is that the initial icebreaker activity about our best-worst experience talking Buddhism to non-Buddhist disappeared from the forum. I personally like things to be open and shared. It seems quite controlled to make them unavailable. I understand the need to un-cluster the forum. But I think the way to do it is not to make some discussion invisible. I may add that I think those are some of the best interactions I have seen so far
Saturday, October 10, 2009
binge replying behavior?
Friday, October 9, 2009
privileged voice?
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Online question-asking behavior
First, they said this is unusual behavior. They said in a f2f class, if you ask a question and nobody answers, you shut up. You don’t usually ask again. This gets me thinking. Okay, maybe I am a little over aggressive in seeking my answer online. In a f2f situation, I probably can pick up people’s body language and tell that they either are not interested in my question or maybe don’t have an answer to it.
In an online environment, I couldn’t know. I thought it might be because my question was buried in the mass threads.
Maybe it was just that nobody thinks my question was interesting enough to answer. Maybe that is the case. But my buddies pointed out something interesting – how we might behave differently f2f vs online
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
highlights from today’s conversation with Bil
• Adding human factors to the online environment – making phone calls, letting them hearing the human voice, be responsive to inquires. Will start by asking questions.
• Teachers’ (current and future) technology level – a common problem I think, and an often overlooked factor in establishing an online program. Teacher’s online presence is substituted by Bil’s aggressive online presence
• Level of student interactions – those who are familiar with the online environment have been activity, motivated, and interacting with one another. There is about half of the “invisible” students who are not yet presence. Bil can see the site logs and know that they actually have been logging in and clicking on lecture links. Due to maybe English and/or technology limitations, they have not been participating. Another factor might be the unfamiliarity with the western educational system to speak up, question, debate, and be active.
• Pre-survey provided some insightful information, especially about people’s time commitment. Most people cannot only spend a very limited amount of time on this program.
• UWest is not investing too many resources into this program. As a one-person shop, Bil might be overworked and overloaded with all aspects of the program.
• Thinking about grouping and the next group assignment – want to mix different levels but consider geographical diversity
My reflections:
1. U West needs to invest more resources to ensure program success. Adding more program staff and provide teacher technology training are two obvious and immediate ones
2. With an open-door policy, a program likes this will have students coming in with different levels of English, technology, and Buddhism content knowledge. This is okay but how to scaffold so the entire community and move forward while each individual can find their own voice is a challenge
I changed to landline connection before the interview but the connection was dropped toward the end. Technology! What can you say?
Monday, October 5, 2009
So the teacher finally surfaced
I have enjoy reading other people’s postings. You can kind of tell a person’s online persona through their writing. I am sure I come across as someone very blunt as I ask blunt questions. That is okay. In real life, I speak my mind too :-)
Sunday, October 4, 2009
orientation week: icebreaker?
I was waiting for the icebreaker activity to happen over the weekend. I guess Bil has decided to not do it. Or maybe he felt the best-worst discussion serves as one. I am still wondering about how to approach the students about the consent form.
Saturday, October 3, 2009
Orientation week: Syllabus received
I like what I see on the syllabus. So there will be some online discussions. Okay, I can handle that. There will be some online lectures. I will have to view them to determine if I like it or not. My prejudice is that I don’t like long video lectures unless the speakers are as engaging as those on TED. There is a group project. I am a little concern about it. It seems to be a big leap from the kind of step-by-step, very easy, low key technology orientation we have been receiving this week, to something that required not only team work but the production of a video. I am not sure what is the design behind this activity; I will make sure to ask Bil.So far everything has been easy to follow, except they seem a little clustered. I attribute it to be the pilot first time around. I like that each orientation video is very short but I find myself fast forward almost all of it. I guess I feel I know the content but still want to view it to be sure. Typical online video watching behavior I assume.
Friday, October 2, 2009
Orientation week: Best and Worst
Some very interesting stories have been shared online. I am very used to this kind of interactions so I can jump right in. I think several others are also seasoned online learners. However, I have also noticed that many students are still missing in action. I wondered why. Have they received all the emails sent by Bil? If so, what are the reasons they have choosen to be not active up to this point? I wish there is a way for me to know.
Here is my post to re-shared here
A couple of weeks ago I posted this on my Facebook message
Pain is inevitable; suffering is option by unknown → translation: Pain could be caused by external factors yet suffering is what you do to yourself.
The next day, I went swimming with a friend at the beach. She told me that she is a little afraid to go too deep out to the ocean because she had encountered a sea turtle just 3 weeks ago and she was so scared by that experience. She has been telling me this in the past 3 weeks during our weekly swim. So I looked at her and asked, is it really that little turtle that has caused you all this suffering? She smiled right back at me and said, I know, the turtle might have caused my initial pain but I am doing this to myself.
I laughed so hard. It might not be how I would relate that quote to this situation but I am thrilled that my friend found a way to apply my Facebook message to her life situation.
Fast forward to a couple of years ago.
I had just entered graduate school and people were curious why I am a vegetarian. Innocently I started to say how cows cried before they were slaughtered. I did not even finish the first couple of sentences, my advisor, whom I deeply respect, angrily in almost a yelling way, interrupted me and said, no, they do not and they are meant to be raised and eaten.
What I learned is I have to say to people of what they can accept. My advisor is a farm girl and she raises animals to be slaughtered. What I was about to say completely contradicted her belief system. So the most common answer now I give to almost anyone is – this is trendy, did you know that being a vegetarian can help reduce a ton of carbon foorprint in a year? If you are a vegan, up that to 2 tons! Most people are impressed and then we can have more conversations on how to do it and why.
Thursday, October 1, 2009
orientation week: Small hiccup
Bil sent another email today to delay the next orientation activity. I can imagine the work involved in putting put a class for the first time. Funny I took yet another peek at the pre survey results today. One person evidently is very skeptical about the benefit of an online class. This person expressed his or her concern by sharing, “I am not sure that you can really teach anything online. But, I hope I am wrong about this.” Great, at least this person is open-minded about the possibility. This person went on to share that “I think that it would take so much time to do an online course properly that it is not possible to do that and conduct research.” It is so true that it takes a tremendous amount of time to get an online class ready. I often wish I can teach face-to-face more since I can have all the content in my head without having to digitalize all of them in advance and post to class BEFORE class! Yes, I understand the concerns very well.Let’s see if this certificate program will move on smoothly and let’s see if and how an online community is formed.